RE: development environment architecture for ASP.NET development team
From: Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer) - MVP (NoSpamMgbworld_at_comcast.netNoSpamM)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Kevin Spencer: "Re: Minimal Shopping Cart"
- Previous message: Raed Sawalha: "Re: Writting RegularExpressionValidator for time?"
- In reply to: Akhlaq Khan: "development environment architecture for ASP.NET development team"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 06:33:03 -0700
The preferred method is to develop locally and use some form of source
control (in most cases SourceSafe). When a developer is ready to push
something to a test server, he gets latest and ensures a build can compile.
It is then pushed up and tested.
NOTE: This was also true in the ASP world.
--- Gregory A. Beamer MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA *************************** Think Outside the Box! *************************** "Akhlaq Khan" wrote: > hi, > we have been working on web based applications built in ASP for quite > sometime now, but now we are moving to ASP.net. we have decided to use > ASP.NET for developing new modules in our current projects (built in ASP). > So, the applications will be composed of both ASP and ASP.NET pages > simultaneously. Since, ASP is a scripting language, it was easier for us to > put all the source code on a single web server, add the web to visual > soursafe using FP extentions in IIS, connect to the web applications from > development workstations using visual interdev and start checking files > in/out without any problem. the developers would test the effects of their > changes right on the web server by hitting refresh or F5. Everything takes > place on the web server, except code modification. > > now, since we are moving from a scripting language to a "compiled" language > (ASP.NET), that means the application would need to be "built" on > development workstations before being deployed on server (check in), since i > cannot expect my developers to build the application on server after every > single change they make on their own machine, coz they will keep switching > between machines forever. Moreover, i want the developers to be able to > "debug" their appliactions rigth on other workstations (i found out that > debugging is nearly impossible if application is placed on server, just like > it was in ASP 3.0). > > My question is: > > 1. What are the standard/recommended architectures for setting up > development environments for ASP.NET applications ? > 2. Which one should i use if i want to use a).visual sourcesafe for version > management. b) debugging capability for all developers on their own machines > rather than server, c) easier maintenance/no or least code synchronization > hassle. > > desparately waiting for response ... > > thanks, > > akhlaq khan. > > >
- Next message: Kevin Spencer: "Re: Minimal Shopping Cart"
- Previous message: Raed Sawalha: "Re: Writting RegularExpressionValidator for time?"
- In reply to: Akhlaq Khan: "development environment architecture for ASP.NET development team"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
