Re: C# vs. ASP for web services?

From: Joyjit Mukherjee (joyjit_mukherjee_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/17/04 

Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:49:59 +0530

Hi,

Sorry for my earlier post. You need the comparison of ASP.NET & C#, i
suppose.
See ASP.NET is a platform for developing web applications for .NET. And C#
is a OO language designed for the .NET platform. So you can write web
services in C#, VB.NET & over a dozen other .NET aware languages.

Regards
Joyjit

"Joyjit Mukherjee" <joyjit_mukherjee@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23NFqQNFhEHA.3264@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> I wonder how could you use ASP within the .NET environment to write web
> services. The former is unmanaged code, while C# produces managed code, is
> optimized, produces MSIL that is compiled to native code by the JIT
> compiler, and executes under CLR. Moreover, C# takes advantage of .NET
> Framework to use ADO .NET to connect to SQL Server 2K, which improves
> performance.
>
> Regards
> Joyjit
>
> "Brett" <Brett@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:17F90A70-EF49-4B49-BF04-E6050C09CB5D@microsoft.com...
> > I want to use .NET for writing web services that will mainly call SQL
> Server
> > (2000) stored procedures in a database. What are the
> > advantages/disadvantages of using C# vs. ASP and vice versa?
> >
> > Also, if any one is familiar with ColdFusion MX, what are the
> > advantages/disadvantages of using .NET (one of the two languages above)
to
> > write the same web service vs. using CFMX?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brett
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
    ... These days I don't do compiler maintenance, but I HAVE done in the past, so ... You had a chance to point out how adherence to the standard can improve ... >> compile it WITH MINOR MODIFICATIONS for a specific platform. ... > platform-specific extension to COBOL ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: interesting use of NEXT SENTENCE vs. CONTINUE
    ... I DID think any old compiler would be able to ... > compile it WITH MINOR MODIFICATIONS for a specific platform. ... > not going to go to the Standard to see what SHOULD work. ... If you write your COBOL code avoiding the things that are marked as ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Standard Ada Preprocessor
    ... because Ada cannot deal with the portability issues. ... > you are interfacing directly to some special-purpose hardware. ... by their nature not compiler ... one platform you get 3 members back, and on another you get 5, ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: C portability is a myth
    ... > solicitation for the availability of a compiler for a given platform. ... People frequently talk about porting applications where no ... Yet further down you say the Java standard ports. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: C portability is a myth
    ... > solicitation for the availability of a compiler for a given platform. ... If the source is pure Standard C ... can be successfully ported to all implementations. ...
    (comp.lang.c)