Re: do we need to have the "dot" in web.config ?
From: Mike Smith (test_at_test.com)
Date: 07/10/04
- Next message: Joe Fawcett: "Re: input type=file customisation"
- Previous message: Sergey Poberezovskiy: "Checking too see if client side validation functions will be sent to the browser"
- In reply to: Teemu Keiski: "Re: do we need to have the "dot" in web.config ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:37:03 +0800
thats supposedly the suffix of the cookie ? hence the DOT
"Teemu Keiski" <joteke@aspalliance.com> wrote in message
news:e52W$5kZEHA.3476@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> no differences. I think it is just a naming habit, nothing more.
>
> --
> Teemu Keiski
> MCP, Microsoft MVP (ASP.NET), AspInsiders member
> ASP.NET Forum Moderator, AspAlliance Columnist
> http://blogs.aspadvice.com/joteke
>
>
> "Tee" <thy@streamyx.com> wrote in message
> news:e4kBgUkZEHA.4032@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > In our web.config, when we are doing forms authentication, we have such
> code
> >
> > <authentication mode="Forms">
> >
> > <forms name=".MyProject" etc etc>
> >
> > I see some example with a . in front of their project name at the <forms
> > name> ... and some don't have the dot ...
> >
> > any differences between the dot or not dot ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Tee
> >
> >
>
>
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. (well i'd like to think it is.. ) Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 27/06/2004
- Next message: Joe Fawcett: "Re: input type=file customisation"
- Previous message: Sergey Poberezovskiy: "Checking too see if client side validation functions will be sent to the browser"
- In reply to: Teemu Keiski: "Re: do we need to have the "dot" in web.config ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|