Re: How Best to Store this Data
From: George Durzi (gdurzi_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 05/19/04
- Next message: Grant: "Re: Newbie - Where Can I Get Examples To Learn From"
- Previous message: Jiho Han: "Re: <system.diagnostics> in web.config"
- In reply to: Bryan: "RE: How Best to Store this Data"
- Next in thread: Bryan: "Re: How Best to Store this Data"
- Reply: Bryan: "Re: How Best to Store this Data"
- Reply: Grant: "Re: How Best to Store this Data"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 14:42:21 -0700
One one hand, the SQL way is familiar, but as you said, it becomes a pain to
maintain the stored procedures and methods, etc.
The Xml alternative would be an interesting and different way to do this (
which is more preferable than sitting down to write a 50 parameter stored
proc ;)
I'll probably have about 1000 records per year. Does that qualify as a lot
of records, or is it still a manageable quantity for doing searches, etc.?
Thank you Bryan
"Bryan" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7FF35988-3A6E-46BB-9C7B-7FAE3DFCB5D6@microsoft.com...
> George,
> There are always advantages and disadvantages to everything... if
you're going to have a lot of records... you'll have to deal with the pain
of keeping up stored procedures and keeping evrything in SQL. If the amount
of records are going to be small then I'd go xml (This is what I've been
hearing). Searches through xml start to get slower as you create bigger
amounts of data. SQL is considerably faster through searches as your data
is bigger.
- Next message: Grant: "Re: Newbie - Where Can I Get Examples To Learn From"
- Previous message: Jiho Han: "Re: <system.diagnostics> in web.config"
- In reply to: Bryan: "RE: How Best to Store this Data"
- Next in thread: Bryan: "Re: How Best to Store this Data"
- Reply: Bryan: "Re: How Best to Store this Data"
- Reply: Grant: "Re: How Best to Store this Data"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|