Re: should I upgrade to 2003

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\) (NoSpamMgbworld_at_comcast.netNoSpamM)
Date: 05/14/04


Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 14:56:21 -0700

I am going to disagree with Curt on this one, as the perf gains alone are a
great reason. But, if you are looking for stellar changes, you would be best
to wait until next year.

-- 
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA
*************************************************
Think outside the box!
*************************************************
"Leon" <vnality@msn.com> wrote in message
news:%23EBpR$dOEHA.2480@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I currently program with 2002 and everything is working
> fine. However, just wanted to is upgrading to 2003 worth
> the trouble. I'm currently working on a few web applications that built
> around the 1.0 .net framework.
>
>


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Motivation...
    ... Curt, I'm new, don't know what to make of it... ... demanding information for some unknown reason... ...
    (misc.fitness.weights)
  • Re: Tattoos and competitive bodybuilding
    ... Curt James wrote: ... sue me now or later? ... had any reason to. ... Yeah, that'd do the trick. ...
    (rec.arts.bodyart)
  • Re: Cool visual illusion
    ... >> Curt Welch wrote: ... >>> The reason the stuff Glen writes turns ... >> Hey Curt: Behavioral Systems Theory ... >> behavioral repertoire with the general ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: Colin Farrell sucks
    ... It really doesn't matter what you write, Larry. ... Curt will always find ... some reason to go spastic over it. ...
    (misc.fitness.weights)