Re: Pushing the limit of PHP vs ASP.NET
From: James Macbell (j.NOSPAMmacbell_at_msn.com)
Date: 05/14/04
- Next message: Scott Allen: "Re: %USERNAME%"
- Previous message: Mark Fitzpatrick: "Re: Netscape problems"
- In reply to: bruce barker: "Re: Pushing the limit of PHP vs ASP.NET"
- Next in thread: Mark Fitzpatrick: "Re: Pushing the limit of PHP vs ASP.NET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 17:37:55 GMT
I tried putting this in, didn't make a difference. I even tried to turn off
"buffering" in App Option in IIS, same thing.
<%@ Page Language="C#" Buffer="false" %>
I think it is not a performance issue, it is the limitation of ASP.NET
(perhaps there is some configuration in IIS or Registry that I need to
set?). Have you tried to run the code on your server and successfully saved
the 150 MB file to your local HDD? I couldn't....
PHP worked it out without problem, even under Apache for Win32, I am very
impressed. I like both ASP.NET and PHP, don't get me wrong, I am NOT trying
to prove which lang is more superior than the other, I just try to find a
solution to my problem encountered.
James
"bruce barker" <nospam_brubar@safeco.com> wrote in message
news:ORAL1HdOEHA.4036@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> turn off page buffering to match php performance.
>
> -- bruce (sqlwork.com)
>
>
> "James Macbell" <j.NOSPAMmacbell@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:aI5pc.2223$0qd.1936@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> > I think I have pushed ASP.NET to the limit, I am not sure if I have done
> > anything wrong in the code because I am trying to make 2 pieces of code
> (C#
> > vs PHP) using the same algorithm. Anyways, here is the my test.
> >
> > How: Create a HTML page with 2 hyper links to these files (posted
below).
> > Right click, Save target As.
> > Tested: On my P4 1.6 GHz , 1 GB Ram server, Windows 2000 IIS 5 and
Apache
> > 1.3 for win32, 100 Mbps LAN
> > Sample Size: 150 MB download
> > Result: IIS stopped responding when I tried to download the link to my
> local
> > HDD across the 100 Mbps network, then it poped up window saying "request
> is
> > unavailable". PHP worked without problem at all, I verified the saved
> file
> > was 150 MB on my local HDD.
> >
> > Note:
> > 1. In C# buffer += "x"; is a bit expensive but I have tried
StringBuffer,
> > doesn't matter, it only runs for 1024 times anyways.
> > 2. I also tried to set Response.BufferOutput = false in C#, but the
> download
> > speed was so slow like back in dial-up ages and the HDD was spinning
like
> > crazy.
> >
> > - James
> >
> > ASP.NET code
> > ===============================================
> >
> > <%@ Page Language="C#" %>
> > <%@ Import Namespace="System.IO" %>
> > <script language="C#" runat="server">
> > void Page_Load() {
> > int size= 156105356; // 150 MB data
> > String buffer = "";
> >
> > for (int i=1; i<=1024; i++)
> > buffer += "x";
> >
> > for (int j=1; j<=size/1024; j++)
> > Response.Write(buffer);
> > }
> > </script>
> >
> >
> > PHP code
> > ===============================================
> >
> > <?php
> >
> > $size= 156105356; // 150 MB data
> > $buffer = "";
> >
> > for ($j=1; $j<=1024; $j++)
> > $buffer .= "x";
> >
> > for ($i=1; $i<=($size/1024); $i++)
> > echo $buffer;
> >
> > ?>
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Scott Allen: "Re: %USERNAME%"
- Previous message: Mark Fitzpatrick: "Re: Netscape problems"
- In reply to: bruce barker: "Re: Pushing the limit of PHP vs ASP.NET"
- Next in thread: Mark Fitzpatrick: "Re: Pushing the limit of PHP vs ASP.NET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
