Re: What is considered orthodox?
From: David Jessee (djessee_at_houston.rr.com)
Date: 05/08/04
- Next message: David Jessee: "Re: Using Data Application block"
- Previous message: David Jessee: "Re: Multiple controls with the same ID..."
- In reply to: Woody Splawn: "What is considered orthodox?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 02:09:33 -0500
For situations where you have "1 application, 1 developer" People almost
always develop on their local machine. Now, as far as how that gets to the
server, it depends on the person and their companies practices. Where I
work, we HAVE to create installation packages for everything, although we
really wish we could just do a straight file copy.
In a group environment, it can change a little. MSoft wrot an article you
might want to scan the looks at some pros and cons -
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnbda/html/tdlg_ch2.asp?frame=true
"Woody Splawn" <nospam@splawns.com> wrote in message
news:ubmVUxDNEHA.1608@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I am abvioulsy new to this and I need to ask a basic question.
>
> What is the orthodox way or the normal or expected way that a web app is
> written? Do you usually write it using localhost and the copy the
> application to the web, or is it considered normal practice to write
> directly to the web ( to your domain name) and the copy that to local host
> for backup?
>
>
>
- Next message: David Jessee: "Re: Using Data Application block"
- Previous message: David Jessee: "Re: Multiple controls with the same ID..."
- In reply to: Woody Splawn: "What is considered orthodox?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
