Re: ADO.NET Transaction
- From: "William Vaughn" <billvaNoSPAM@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:49:31 -0700
If it were me I would probably call a stored procedure that started the transaction ran all of the SPs, handled the exceptions, channeled the logic and returned success or failure via RETURN... but that's just me. I'm not a fan of client-side transactions...
--
____________________________________
William (Bill) Vaughn
Author, Mentor, Consultant, Dad, Grandpa
Microsoft MVP
INETA Speaker
www.betav.com
www.betav.com/blog/billva
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
__________________________________
Visit www.hitchhikerguides.net to get more information on my latest book:
Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition)
and Hitchhiker's Guide to SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (EBook)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Lit" <sql_agentman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:e0$W7bg2HHA.6072@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
using ADO.NET 2.0, VS.NET 2005, SQL2005
I need to execute several Stored Procedures under one transaction. Can I use just one transaction or have to use multiple ( then commit or rollback all )
How does it work with ADO.NET
Ado.Tran
SP1 Called
loop
SP2 Called
SP3 Called
loop
SP4 Called
loop
Sp5 Called
Etc... etc...
if any error
rollback transaction ( or all transactions )
else
committe Transaction ( or all Transactions )
Thanks for any help or other Ideas
Lit
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ADO.NET Transaction
- From: Lit
- Re: ADO.NET Transaction
- References:
- ADO.NET Transaction
- From: Lit
- ADO.NET Transaction
- Prev by Date: Re: ADO.NET 2.0 saving single space to SQL?
- Next by Date: Adding new rows
- Previous by thread: ADO.NET Transaction
- Next by thread: Re: ADO.NET Transaction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|