Re: ODBC or OLE DB
- From: "Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\)" <NoSpamMgbworld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:35:36 -0500
As long as you can find providers for each database, OLEDB is faster than
ODBC. ODBC has more options, but I believe you can find providers for all of
the databases you have listed (have not tried Ingres personally; there is an
open source driver for MySql, however).
--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA
*************************************************
Think outside of the box!
*************************************************
"Chris" <chrisxxxNO_SPAM@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:450df606$0$7315$5a62ac22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
What should I choose ODBC or OLE DB?
I need to connect to Oracle, SQLServer, Ingres and maybe MySQL.
I am not using stored procedures.
I cannot find any microsoft recomendations on there MSDN site.
Can anyone point me to some documents that have the benifits of one over
the other. i.e Performance Issues....
Thanks
Chris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ODBC or OLE DB
- From: Chris
- Re: ODBC or OLE DB
- References:
- ODBC or OLE DB
- From: Chris
- ODBC or OLE DB
- Prev by Date: RE: gridview databind timeout
- Next by Date: Re: chunking in binary (BLOB) data for generic providers
- Previous by thread: ODBC or OLE DB
- Next by thread: Re: ODBC or OLE DB
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading