Re: ADO.NET Timout

There are lots of ways to start SPs including OSQL/ISQL/SQLCMD that don't
require ADO.NET at all. To do so in ADO.NET, simply create a Command object,
set the CommandText to the SP name and set the CommandType to stored
procedure and execute it. You might also want to set the CommandTimeout as
discussed earlier.

--
____________________________________
William (Bill) Vaughn
Author, Mentor, Consultant
Microsoft MVP
INETA Speaker
www.betav.com/blog/billva
www.betav.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
__________________________________

"Lit" <sql_agentman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23Pxlt4JlGHA.1600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
William,

However how can I just tell SQL via ADO.NET to start executing a stored
procedure and that's it.
I don't need any returned values.
Can I tell it to start a Job? That in turn execute SP(s)

Thanks for your help

Lit


"William (Bill) Vaughn" <billvaRemoveThis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e7ftZsJlGHA.1340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sure it will (timeout). You need to set the Command.Timeout property to
the number of seconds required to complete the operation. 0 :: wait
indefinitely. I don't recommend this approach as your execution thread
will hang indefinitely.

--
____________________________________
William (Bill) Vaughn
Author, Mentor, Consultant
Microsoft MVP
INETA Speaker
www.betav.com/blog/billva
www.betav.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
__________________________________

"Lit" <sql_agentman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Oh9mTPJlGHA.3528@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
William,

So the 30 sec Connection Timeout will have no effect when a SP called
asynchronously?
Do I still have to give it a higher time value?
What I am trying to do is call a SP and let it execute no matter how
long it takes it.
Being asynchronous does not mean it is not going to timeout?

Thanks

Lit

"William (Bill) Vaughn" <billvaRemoveThis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O7kzv$IlGHA.4024@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A SP can be called asynchronously from ADO.NET (2.0) by using the
BeginExecute method of the Command object. ADO classic supports async
ops as well. I'll be discussing this in my session on Async operations
at VSLive this week (Thursday 11:30) in Vegas.

--
____________________________________
William (Bill) Vaughn
Author, Mentor, Consultant
Microsoft MVP
INETA Speaker
www.betav.com/blog/billva
www.betav.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
__________________________________

"Lit" <sql_agentman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:exSXh3IlGHA.4872@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mary,

How can I call a stored procedure to do its thing asynchronously.

What is the best way of doing this?

Thank You,

Lit


"Mary Chipman [MSFT]" <mchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mfs592l5gnd5lhm1pr28o9mt6q0d5bq1e0@xxxxxxxxxx
If the connection is terminated, then any active transactions that
are
occuring inside the stored procedure that have not yet been committed
will be rolled back. Any committed transactions will be preserved. If
you want all work items inside of the stored procedure to be handled
as a single unit of work, you can implement an explicit transaction.
For more information, see "Explicit Transactions" in SQL Server Books
Online.

--Mary

On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:53:31 -0700, "Lit" <sql_agentman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Hello,

The default ADO.NET Timeout is 30 seconds.
If I execute a Stored procedure that takes lets say 120 seconds then
what
happens.

ADO.NET Times and throws an exception

But what about SQL Server Does SQL Server keep on Executing the
Stored
procedure?

Thanks

Lit













.

Relevant Pages