Re: ASP.Net confusion between 1.1 and 2.0
- From: "Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <notmyfirstname@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:16:09 +0200
Brent,
There are three versions of ASPNET comparing to ASP both for 1.x as for 2.0
A kind of way as is complete as ASP with some new statements
A kind of way with codeBehind but still everytime compiled at runtime
A kind of way with build code Behind, everytime build when you debug it as
well buildable as in every DotNet project.
(The last method is as I use).
The same exist in ASPNET 2.0 with the difference that the build for real is
done in the Publish phase. (There are some moves back from the extreme
difference between a ASPNET application and all other dotNet applications
which were in the first release from 2.0, you can download those changes
from the ASPNET website).
CodeBehind has in 2.0 the name CodePage.
I hope this helps,
Cor
"Brent" <brentwa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:%23gMFSCrfGHA.4080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ok guys/gals i have the task of upgrading a app at work from asp.net 1.1
to 2.0. Since ive only worked with .Net briefly and asp.net once i need a
little help here. I have been googling around and really haven't got the
answer to my question.
I guess my confusion started when we had a meeting on this conversion. The
guy here at work who has done most of our asp.net work told my mananger
that the conversion of asp.net 1.1 to 2.0 might be sticky a little bit
because previously they only had to deploy 1 dll. He said with this new
version it compiles each page as a dll so there would be many more dlls to
deploy. Ok this has confused me. When you deployed a 1.1 asp.net app
didn't you only have to deploy the aspx pages, code behind pages (.vb or
.cs), and the dlls that you referenced in your asp.net app? When you ran
the page .net would compile your entire application and stick the dll in a
temp directory on the web server. Am i incorrect? If i am correct what
does compiling a web project really do other than do maybe syntax checking
when you do it from the IDE?
Ok people this is where im confused. I know .Net has that new Precompile
thing so people can't look at your source files if they break into your
web server but i don't think we are going to be doing that as far as i
know. I know with 2.0 a new feature was the ability to use a different
langauge on each page but i would just think this compile each dll into
the temp directory for the web page.
Any help would be appreciated.
thanks,
Brent
.
- References:
- ASP.Net confusion between 1.1 and 2.0
- From: Brent
- ASP.Net confusion between 1.1 and 2.0
- Prev by Date: Re: Any way to speed up this Access DB process?
- Next by Date: Re: Using Visual Basic And Crystal Reports, How To Count Number Of Database Sales To A Customer
- Previous by thread: ASP.Net confusion between 1.1 and 2.0
- Next by thread: Re: ASP.Net confusion between 1.1 and 2.0
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
