Re: Problem with updating MDF Data file as opposed to updating a r
- From: "Jeff Dillon" <jeffdillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:17:29 -0700
Why don't you want to run SQL Server on the clients?
<multiformity@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1147382632.900529.289000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well crud,
I was hoping that they had included the classes needed to connect to
the MDF file in .Net 2.0 (considering that SQL Server Express is so
.Net friendly, I had figured that this was the case).
Looks like I will simply serialize the data to XML instead, and
load/save it when the application opens/closes. Not ideal, but ohh
well. I only have one table currently, so it will be bearable, but now
I am going to have to seriously re-consider adding anything new to the
data structure...
Again, seems that they would make it run without having to have SQL
Server running on the client machine. The only benefit is like the MSDN
page said that you can have multiple copies of the same program runinng
with different database files, and not have to attach a million DB's to
the database for no reason. I guess it just isn't possible to run with
a shell set of DLL's like MDAC does to get into MS Access, but you
don't have to have Access installed. Maybe they will add this in
3.0.....
Anywho, thanks for all your help guys, this question is answered :D
AB
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problem with updating MDF Data file as opposed to updating a r
- From: multiformity
- Re: Problem with updating MDF Data file as opposed to updating a r
- References:
- Problem with updating MDF Data file as opposed to updating a running SQL Server DB
- From: multiformity
- Re: Problem with updating MDF Data file as opposed to updating a running SQL Server DB
- From: Otis Mukinfus
- Re: Problem with updating MDF Data file as opposed to updating a running SQL Server DB
- From: multiformity
- Re: Problem with updating MDF Data file as opposed to updating a r
- From: multiformity
- Problem with updating MDF Data file as opposed to updating a running SQL Server DB
- Prev by Date: Re: VS.NET 2003, ADO.NET 1.1 and Access 2000: Getting a Concurrency violation
- Next by Date: Re: .NET Transactions across multiple business Objects
- Previous by thread: Re: Problem with updating MDF Data file as opposed to updating a r
- Next by thread: Re: Problem with updating MDF Data file as opposed to updating a r
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|