Re: Have you stopped using ADO?
- From: "Sahil Malik [MVP C#]" <contactmethrumyblog@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 15:11:44 -0500
I don't see how it is any easier to open a pessimistic lock in ADO than it
is in ADO.NET.
- Sahil Malik [MVP]
ADO.NET 2.0 book -
http://codebetter.com/blogs/sahil.malik/archive/2005/05/13/63199.aspx
__________________________________________________________
"Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <notmyfirstname@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uuvuml1PGHA.3804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Vayse,
To create a Jet engine you need ADO (only to create the engine)
If you want to use pessimistic concurrency than it is probably easier to
use Ado. Know than that you use it with all its disadvantages comparing to
ADONET. Two of those disadvantages of Ado is that it has always to be used
connected to the DataBase and has not those serialize possibilities as
ADONET.
I hope that this gives some idea.
Cor
.
- References:
- Have you stopped using ADO?
- From: Vayse
- Re: Have you stopped using ADO?
- From: Cor Ligthert [MVP]
- Have you stopped using ADO?
- Prev by Date: Re: Using Widows Authentication and accesssing SQL with SQL Authentication
- Next by Date: Typed datasets 3-tier application
- Previous by thread: Re: Have you stopped using ADO?
- Next by thread: Must declare the scalar variable "@" - paramaterized sqlclient insert - HELP!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
