Re: Parameter Object really necessary?
- From: "W.G. Ryan eMVP" <WilliamRyan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:26:00 -0400
I agree, I hate scrolling down. In this case, I *think* that there may have
been some formatting issue b/c when I looked at the message, you could see
the whole thing, Original question and my answer, in one window.
I know that some people (in Comp.Os.Linux.Advocacy, it gets UGLY if you top
post and I mean UGLY) get really really mad about top posting though, when
to me, bottom posting is a lot more annoying. Bottom POsting advocates say
that in long conversations, top posting makes it impossible to read, but
IMHO, it's the exact opposite, WIth top posts, you always know where to look
and don't have to scroll down or exclude signatures or anything else.
Agreeing with you also has the side benefit of putting me in good company a
la "Great minds think alike" ;-)
--
W.G. Ryan, MVP
www.tibasolutions.com | www.devbuzz.com | www.knowdotnet.com
"William (Bill) Vaughn" <billvaNoSpam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23i6jYaFcFHA.4040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Huh? Are they complaining that the response (our answer) is at the top of
> the message and not at the bottom? I find it a royal PITB to scroll down
> to the end to answer or to find an answer. I'm too old and ornery to
> change.
>
> --
> ____________________________________
> William (Bill) Vaughn
> Author, Mentor, Consultant
> Microsoft MVP
> www.betav.com/blog/billva
> www.betav.com
> www.sqlreportingservices.net
> Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> __________________________________
>
>
> "W.G. Ryan eMVP" <WilliamRyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%2349EU6EcFHA.228@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cor - I'm not sure what you mean. I posted this one at the top like I
>> always do.. If there's a formatting issue, I can't see it on my end and
>> don't think I did anything different, but if you could send me a screen
>> shot, I could then see it and look into the problem.
>>
>> Thanks for bringing it to my attention ;-)
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> --
>> W.G. Ryan, MVP
>>
>> www.tibasolutions.com | www.devbuzz.com | www.knowdotnet.com
>> "Cor Ligthert" <notmyfirstname@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:euKzUIEcFHA.3488@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Dear mister Ryan,
>>>
>>> I don't mind of something is topposted, lowposted or whatever, however a
>>> message with rows which expand the distance almost from Amsterdam to New
>>> York, is almost a little bit to much for my reading capabilities.
>>>
>>> Will you please be so kind to post next time not in this format.
>>>
>>> (Yes I know I am not obliged to read your message however mostly I do
>>> that with much pleasure)
>>>
>>> :-))
>>>
>>> Cor
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Parameter Object really necessary?
- From: Shawn B.
- Re: Parameter Object really necessary?
- From: Cor Ligthert
- Re: Parameter Object really necessary?
- References:
- Re: Parameter Object really necessary?
- From: Cor Ligthert
- Re: Parameter Object really necessary?
- From: W.G. Ryan eMVP
- Re: Parameter Object really necessary?
- From: William \(Bill\) Vaughn
- Re: Parameter Object really necessary?
- Prev by Date: Re: Dataset to typed dataset ?
- Next by Date: Re: Performance Question when using a DataReader
- Previous by thread: Re: Parameter Object really necessary?
- Next by thread: Re: Parameter Object really necessary?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|