Re: Concurrent Connections / Shared Transaction
From: Angel Saenz-Badillos[MS] (angelsa_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/16/05
- Next message: Shawn B.: "Re: Concurrent Connections / Shared Transaction"
- Previous message: Hemang Shah: "Performing Lookups on Dataset"
- In reply to: Pablo Castro [MS]: "Re: Concurrent Connections / Shared Transaction"
- Next in thread: Shawn B.: "Re: Concurrent Connections / Shared Transaction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:10:00 -0800
That's why Pablo gets paid the big bucks :) Seriously if you want the best
info always look for his posts and articles.
He is completelly correct by the way, you will not be able to use this with
concurrently operating connections, sorry.
-- Angel Saenz-Badillos [MS] Managed Providers This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no rights.Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup purposes only. I am now blogging about ADO.NET: http://weblogs.asp.net/angelsb/ "Pablo Castro [MS]" <pablocas@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:elFsi4OKFHA.1500@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Actually, bound sessions allow you to share the transaction space among two > connections but doesn't give you concurrent access to it. If you try to > execute a batch on a connection while the other is actively doing something > within the transaction the server will return an error saying that the > transaction context is in use. > > COM+ is the only solution I know of for this scenario. Even with COM+/DTC > you'll see some serialization around the transaction. In ADO.NET 2.0 + SQL > Server 2005 you can mix MARS plus asynchronous command execution to submit > two requests concurrently within the same transaction; however, note that in > that case you won't get parallelism in the server; multiple MARS sessions > within a connection are interleaved, not executed in parallel. > > -- > Pablo Castro > Program Manager - ADO.NET Team > Microsoft Corp. > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > "Angel Saenz-Badillos[MS]" <angelsa@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:uJbeJ0FKFHA.1340@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > As long as both connections are to the same instance of Sql Server you can > > use sp_bindsession to get this behavior without having to use distributed > > transactions. > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/tsqlref/ts_sp_ba-bz_9ini.asp > > > > Hope this helps. > > -- > > Angel Saenz-Badillos [MS] Managed Providers > > This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no > > rights.Please do not send email directly to this alias. > > This alias is for newsgroup purposes only. > > I am now blogging about ADO.NET: http://weblogs.asp.net/angelsb/ > > > > > > > > > > "Dumitru Sbenghe" <sbenghe@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:uyT4fXwJFHA.2752@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > >> Given the current status of ADO.NET (version 1.1), you can not do what > >> you > >> want. Because the SqlClient provider permit only one command running on a > >> given connection at a time, the only solution will be a distributed > >> transaction coordinator + 2 connections with 2 commands executed > >> concurrently aka ES/COM+ in .NET . or wait until ADO.NET 2.0 will be > >> released :), version which will permit this behavior. > >> > >> > >> > >> Dumitru > >> > >> > >> "Shawn B." <leabre@html.com> wrote in message > >> news:uA6kqFtJFHA.1096@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > >> > Greetings, > >> > > >> > I have two SqlCommands objects that each need to execute concurrently > > but > >> > I > >> > want them both to be a part of the same transaction. > >> > > >> > What I'm doing is created one SqlCommand and Beginning a transaction. > >> > > >> > I have another SqlCommand that is being executed from within an > >> > Asynchronous > >> > delegate that needs to participate in the same transaction. The > >> > problem > >> > is > >> > that I get the infamous exception stating that the connection is > >> > already > >> > in > >> > use. > >> > > >> > COM+ is not an answer here. > >> > > >> > What I want to know is if there is a way to make this work correctly > > using > >> > only ADO.NET? > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Shawn > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >
- Next message: Shawn B.: "Re: Concurrent Connections / Shared Transaction"
- Previous message: Hemang Shah: "Performing Lookups on Dataset"
- In reply to: Pablo Castro [MS]: "Re: Concurrent Connections / Shared Transaction"
- Next in thread: Shawn B.: "Re: Concurrent Connections / Shared Transaction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
