Re: Dotnet versus Java-Applets
From: germanov (germanov_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 11/10/04
- Next message: germanov: "Re: Dotnet versus Java-Applets"
- Previous message: Daniel James: "Re: Dotnet versus Java-Applets"
- In reply to: Daniel James: "Re: Dotnet versus Java-Applets"
- Next in thread: Daniel James: "Re: Dotnet versus Java-Applets"
- Reply: Daniel James: "Re: Dotnet versus Java-Applets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:28:05 -0800
Dan,
Not to quibble about 2000/XP being required for .NET but right now most of
my .NET software is binary compatable and runs completely unchanged on Mono
equipped Linux systems and on Mac OSX Panther systems. Also much of the
software I have written for PocketPC runs unchanged on Linux, Mac and Windows
systems and performs far better than it would if written in Java.
V
"Daniel James" wrote:
The problem is that .NET isn't available in the browser on Macs or
> linux or BSD unix or Solaris or Palm pilots, or most smartphones or
> minicomputers ... or any of the millions of other computers that don't run
> Windows 2000/XP or don't have the .NET runtime installed.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.
>
>
>
>
- Next message: germanov: "Re: Dotnet versus Java-Applets"
- Previous message: Daniel James: "Re: Dotnet versus Java-Applets"
- In reply to: Daniel James: "Re: Dotnet versus Java-Applets"
- Next in thread: Daniel James: "Re: Dotnet versus Java-Applets"
- Reply: Daniel James: "Re: Dotnet versus Java-Applets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
