Re: help- .NET application - very tough architecture question
- From: "simon-john roberts" <_no_spam_remove_this_postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:07:19 -0000
..Net installer for CD.
Thin client.. unsure... will depend on clients having web access... need more deets on that.
Server - .Net 3.5, WPF actually provides a load of 3d tools - I just finished a 3D engine in WPF... 1 click installer, on a CD.
Sound good?
SegFault.
<bbcrock@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:6dada589-4bca-418a-8d94-bf8faebbd9d4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
anyone?
On Mar 7, 10:54 pm, bbcr...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:A friend has the WORST software architecture situation in the world.
I was wondering if anyone could help me walk him through it.
He has a business logic engine for mapping 3-d data to the screen
written in C++.
His clients want him to create a thin-client, preferably a web-based
tool on a CD-Rom. This can have an access database on the backend.
The clients want to deliver this product in 2009. So there will be a
cd rom with a one-click install that will utilize the 3d mapping
engine in C++.
He must then take the same code and implement it on a server in 2010.
The same front-end and the same middleware must be put on a server.
The clients do not have a server now.
As you can imagine this is a noncommercial product. The above
requirements cannot change unless we can positively prove they won't
work.
We are looking into how to architect something like this. Any tips or
tricks?
thanks!
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: ClickOnce Store metadata "AppType" is not valid
- Next by Date: Re: get/set, connectionstring,function pgms say "...already conts defn
- Previous by thread: Re: help- .NET application - very tough architecture question
- Next by thread: RE: System.Delegate.Remove fialed on remote delegates
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
