Re: COM+ vs .Net Remoting vs...
- From: Michael Nemtsev <nemtsev@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:56:57 +0000 (UTC)
Hello Aleksandr,
AS> Because customer doesn't allow to use it... or to use any otherIm not sure if it really helps you in that. Didn't standard NLB
redirect your calls? Why to write custom one?
AS> third-party (free or not, Microsoft's - too) component, product
AS>
What do u mean? NLB is the component of the windows 2003 server, btw MS ships Cluster Server
AS> I wanted to see comparision of using COM+ and Remoting not from
AS> performance point of view but from features side.
I'm not good with remoting and always use COM+ for 2 reason: performance and supporting next version of commutication technologies.
COM+ is declarative technology, all features are set with attributes. Remoting request hardcoding.
Next version of communications - WCF gives COM+ full support. Remoting is out of this game
AS> It's interesting. May be I looked bad - where this could beAS> As I know network connection to COM+ is allowed since COM+ 1.5Why don't connect to the managed custom COM+ component, that will
serve as TCPGateway and will redirect calls futher. It's facage
class in your solution
AS> (Server 2003) or not? And ahy this is better then Web service TCP
AS> service?
What do u mean with COM+ network connection? You can use
DCOM/Remoting to interact with your COM+
AS> described?
What exactly? How to interact with COM+ by DCOM? It's set in the proxy that u create in COM+ Adming MMC window
AS> Yes, this is in case of failover cluster, but we want to consider
AS> another type of cluster (it seems grid) - cluster with operation
AS> distributing, for example
Think aboup p2p connections, I would choose this way, due to good support p2p in vista
You need scrutinize how u will find nodes in your grid and register new node to be find
---
WBR,
Michael Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.msn.com/laflour
"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Business Objects / COM+ / MTS
- Next by Date: Re: COM+ vs .Net Remoting vs...
- Previous by thread: Re: COM+ vs .Net Remoting vs...
- Next by thread: Re: COM+ vs .Net Remoting vs...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|