Re: ASP.Net Performance Problems
From: Sam Santiago (ssantiago_at_n0spam-SoftiTechture.com)
Date: 12/14/04
- Next message: Furzehill Bill: "How do I distribute EnterpriseServices components as COM+ proxies?"
- Previous message: Garnet2: "Re: COM + & SqlClient"
- In reply to: Neal: "Re: ASP.Net Performance Problems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:29:56 -0800
My previous message will be useful then - you need a performance profiler
to determine which pages/classes in your ASP.NET application are responsible
for the high CPU usage. It could be as simple as tuning a single class, but
until you do some profiling you will just be shooting in the dark. Many of
the profilers out there offer a free trial period. Might be long enough to
find your problem. Good luck.
Thanks,
Sam
-- _______________________________ Sam Santiago ssantiago@n0spam-SoftiTechture.com http://www.SoftiTechture.com _______________________________ "Neal" <Neal@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:DF9625EB-4F79-48E9-B8E8-597440CCB948@microsoft.com... > Hi, > I just received the results etc > They are > > The stress testing was conducted over a week long period using the > Microsoft > Web Application Stress 1.1 tool. During the testing I have monitored both > the webserver (DEVWEB) and the database server (DEVDB). > > Web server :1 x 350 MHz Pentium...{May Explain a lot} > 512 Mb RAM > 28GB Hard disk > Windows 2000 Server SP4IIS 5.0 > > 10 Concurrent Users exercising all urls, > > Web Server > > Disk I/O - OK > Memory utilisation - OK > CPU - overloaded > > DB Server > > Disk I/O - OK > Memory utilisation - OK > CPU - OK > > The tests that we performed were directly monitored on each server. > Supporting data is attached. > > We found that 10 concurrent users maxed out the > web servers CPU and pushed the processor queue length way beyond its > acceptable tolerance. It should not exceed 2, whereas the tests we > performed logged it at circa > 20. > > The performance test data shows that the ASPNET_WP application CPU > utilisation hovers above the 75% critical level if the stress level > (number > of Threads) is increased to 10 or more. The number of Threads equates to > the > number of concurrent connections. The total CPU utilisation borders on > 100% > for the duration of the test. The processor queue length averages about > 23, > 071 indicating that a number of threads are being queued as the processor > cannot coupe with the load. This indicates that there is a CPU bottleneck > for the current server configuration. > > The data also shows that disk IO is not a problem. The tests showed that > the performance counters are well within the recommended values. The % > disk > idle time averages about 99% which indicates very little disk reads. > Memory > usage does not seem to be a problem at all. The % committed bytes in use > does not exceed the 25% mark for the full duration of the test. > > This will be tested on a Dual Pentium Processor (the Varsity's Production > WebServer), next, but .....!! > > So seems the number of threads created, used pooled > instantiated/de-instantiated may be the problem...Just guessing, I know > squat > about this. > > thanks > Neal > > > "Sam Santiago" wrote: > >> Which CPU was maxed out - the DB or the Web server? You should probably >> run >> a profiling tool during the test to determine which class is the culprit. >> I >> personally like a tool from AutomatedQA called AQTime4 - >> http://www.automatedqa.com. Microsoft offers a freebie that is not >> quite >> as user friendly, but effective once you figure it out: >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/downloads/default.aspx. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Sam >> >> -- >> _______________________________ >> Sam Santiago >> ssantiago@n0spam-SoftiTechture.com >> http://www.SoftiTechture.com >> _______________________________ >> "Neal" <Neal@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:FDA668A3-5396-4CC1-A47C-498003A3DC4D@microsoft.com... >> > Hi All >> > >> > An app I wrote (ASP.NET) against SQL Server was Load Tested by our IS >> > division, and they came back with a max of 10 concurrent users before >> > the >> > Server's CPU was overloaded. >> > Running ACT against the same app on the same Server, I was getting 1746 >> > concurrent users before a time out occurred. (using the ACT graphs >> > showing >> > RPS and TLB ) >> > >> > I am using StoredProcs, and the SQL server optimised providers (in >> > code), >> > populating datasets, with some caching, to Grids and labels and >> > DropDowns, >> > ..nothing unusual or rocket science. >> > The datasets are also optimised (kept as small as possible) >> > >> > Is this possible , surely not with .Net ??, could there be an >> > explanation >> > in >> > the deployment, IIS or in the app?? >> > >> > Thanks >> > Neal >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Neal Rogers >> > University of Cape Town >> >> >>
- Next message: Furzehill Bill: "How do I distribute EnterpriseServices components as COM+ proxies?"
- Previous message: Garnet2: "Re: COM + & SqlClient"
- In reply to: Neal: "Re: ASP.Net Performance Problems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|