Re: Architecture Discussion (MS Response?)
From: Sanjeeva (sanjeeva_at_proteans.com)
Date: 07/17/04
- Next message: Paul Glavich [MVP - ASP.NET]: "Re: Calling distributed serviced component in vb.net - COM+"
- Previous message: Henrik H: "Change reffence to a DCOM/Serviced component"
- In reply to: Martin Platt: "Re: Architecture Discussion (MS Response?)"
- Next in thread: Bill: "Re: Architecture Discussion (MS Response?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:20:14 -0700
Hi Martin,
I'd be more than glad to see such forum ... I constantly search for .NET
architecture stuff.
We need such a group.
Rega
"Martin Platt" <MartinPlatt@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:95F8C091-7BC6-486C-BEE9-84B8062FE47E@microsoft.com...
> Klaus,
>
> What would we need to do to make such a forum appear?
> From my perspective, all the coding skills in the world are wasted without
a good design, and finding a good architecture to use would showcase those
skills.
> Can we make this happen at all? I have a fair amount of experience in
building architectures, but in previous years, when trying to come up with a
clean solution, I searched the forums and those searches came back
fruitless. It would be nice to help people who are starting out, with such
discussions, to narrow down the searching, and provide a technical basis on
which a design might be founded... We have a .NET framework, why not expose
a set of .NET architecture implementations??
>
> Any takers?!!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Martin.
>
> "Klaus H. Probst" wrote:
>
> > There is none, for now at least.
> >
> > This is as good as it gets for the time being.
> >
> > --
> > Klaus H. Probst, MVP
> > http://www.vbbox.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > "Sanjeeva" <sanjeeva@proteans.com> wrote in message
> > news:egEJgL$ZEHA.2520@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > Hey! I'm also in search of such a group.. Can anyone help me locating
it?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Sanjeeva
> > >
> > > "Martin Platt" <Martin Platt@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
> > > news:98FB75B3-CE9C-4AC5-94E2-580CCFFA7866@microsoft.com...
> > > > Hi All!
> > > >
> > > > Is there an architecture discussion forum on here? If not, there
should
> > > be! It would be great to be able to discuss the pros and cons of
> > different
> > > implementations of a solution for different targets and environments.
> > > Code-wise generally you get to know how to solve something, however,
how
> > > good that implementation is depends largely on the choice of
architecture.
> > > >
> > > > I'm aware of some excellent Microsoft documents about this very
subject,
> > > one of which, whilst complete, is 166 pages long, and is a fairly
abstract
> > > discussion. Particular implementations would give our clients better
> > > solutions because many people's idea are definitely better than just
one
> > > persons.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Martin Platt.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
- Next message: Paul Glavich [MVP - ASP.NET]: "Re: Calling distributed serviced component in vb.net - COM+"
- Previous message: Henrik H: "Change reffence to a DCOM/Serviced component"
- In reply to: Martin Platt: "Re: Architecture Discussion (MS Response?)"
- Next in thread: Bill: "Re: Architecture Discussion (MS Response?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
