Re: Future or TAPI
- From: Michael Dunn <tapi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 20:24:04 -0700
Andreas Marschall [MVP TAPI] wrote:
"Matthias Moetje" <moetje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:OzAqCrKYFHA.2588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am not completely sure but in data mode Unimodem might even be able to report CS_INPROGRESS and CS_CONNECTED (but I never tried that).
Matthias, I just checked and it does only generate the call states blindly (like in voice mode).
They shouldn't. I know from a few years ago when I did some testing, the CONNECTED state would only occur after the handshaking is done at the AT string CONNECT 14400 (or whatever) would appear.
Try setting the media mode in the lpCallParams in lineMakeCall. Also try looking at LINECALLINFO/LINECALLSTATUS to see what it thinks the media mode is.
That being said, there is no money in modems these days. Companies are no longer doing real development work on them and the quality seems to be slipping.
-- Michael Dunn (Microsoft MVP) is a TAPI Developer and Tester TAPI web page: http://www.rainyjay.com/tapi/tapi.htm TAPI discussions belong in the newsgroup, and not in private email. "I'm not insane, I'm just choosy about the reality I accept." .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Future or TAPI
- From: Andreas Marschall [MVP TAPI]
- Re: Future or TAPI
- References:
- Future or TAPI
- From: Matthias Moetje
- Re: Future or TAPI
- From: Angus Comber
- Re: Future or TAPI
- From: Matthias Moetje
- Re: Future or TAPI
- From: Angus Comber
- Re: Future or TAPI
- From: Matthias Moetje
- Re: Future or TAPI
- From: Andreas Marschall [MVP TAPI]
- Future or TAPI
- Prev by Date: Problem answering calls
- Next by Date: Re: Future or TAPI
- Previous by thread: Re: Future or TAPI
- Next by thread: Re: Future or TAPI
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|