Future or TAPI
- From: "Matthias Moetje" <moetje@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 16:12:07 +0200
Hello all,
in case you didn't already know, I'd like to inform you that the
new call control capabilities of Live Communications Server
2005 SP1 in combination with Office Communicator 2005
rely on a CSTA link to PBXs instead of TAPI.
I don't know the reason for this decision but anyway I think
it's kind of sad that MS does not seem to rely on TAPI for
new products. (MS Speech Server is not built on TAPI either,
although TAPI would have been an ideal platform for it).
Please share your comments...
Best regards,
Matthias Moetje
-------------------------------------
TERASENS GmbH
Ackermannstraße 3
80797 München
-------------------------------------
Fon: +49 89 143370-0
Fax: +49 89 143370-22
e-mail: moetje at terasens dot de
www: www.terasens.de
-------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Future or TAPI
- From: Andreas Marschall [MVP TAPI]
- Re: Future or TAPI
- From: Grant Schenck
- Re: Future or TAPI
- From: Angus Comber
- Re: Future or TAPI
- Prev by Date: Re: Tapi 3 Session Termination - Phone IDLE State
- Next by Date: Where is?
- Previous by thread: Using TAPI Argent office Network Alchemy CTI
- Next by thread: Re: Future or TAPI
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading