Re: DCOM
From: Alexander Nickolov (agnickolov_at_mvps.org)
Date: 11/18/04
- Next message: Alexander Nickolov: "Re: easy way to implement IStream"
- Previous message: Jonarking: "easy way to implement IStream"
- In reply to: Gerry: "DCOM"
- Next in thread: Santhosh Pillai [MS]: "Re: DCOM"
- Reply: Santhosh Pillai [MS]: "Re: DCOM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:32:29 -0800
Here's the WinXP SP2 changes document:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/sp2chngs.mspx
-- ===================================== Alexander Nickolov Microsoft MVP [VC], MCSD email: agnickolov@mvps.org MVP VC FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq ===================================== "Gerry" <Gerry@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:3E5384D2-23F4-4E9B-9F0F-17227ED37628@microsoft.com... > After fighting Windows XP PRO security settings to get my DCOM server > working, my manager has asked me to defend the decision to continue using > DCOM. We use DCOM in a distributed control system for automated > equipment. > Once the system is at a point where interfaces are successfully remoted > for > the first time (after security has been disabled/configured/slaughtered) > everthing goes smooth and our systems work very well. Developing for our > systems is easy with the architecture we have chosen. The problems > started > when we switched to the Windows XP platform and seems to crop up when > Microsoft updates the OS. Does Microsoft have documentation that might > help? > Does anyone have any suggestions? I have noticed through a web search > that > others have similar problems but there doesn't seem to be a universal > solution.
- Next message: Alexander Nickolov: "Re: easy way to implement IStream"
- Previous message: Jonarking: "easy way to implement IStream"
- In reply to: Gerry: "DCOM"
- Next in thread: Santhosh Pillai [MS]: "Re: DCOM"
- Reply: Santhosh Pillai [MS]: "Re: DCOM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|