Re: Howto get workgroup name
- From: "Arkady Frenkel" <arkadyf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:29:44 +0200
That always exist struggle between correctness and efficiency , and not
always correct ( secure in this case ) behaviour is first topic requirement.
E.g. in closed lan system ( embedded and/or RT ) that very common practice
to put efficiency as top priority
Arkady
"Eugene Gershnik" <gershnik@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23VCe4z6QGHA.4608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Arkady Frenkel wrote:
and try to ask wmi group
microsoft.public.win32.programmer.wmi
WMI won't help a bit because it will require to authenticate too. [If
there is some kind of hack to do it with WMI this would be a security hole
which MS will sooner or later close]. The problem is fundamental and has
nothing to do with the mechanism used to perform the query.
Also note that the suggestion to install an "agent" on the host that would
answer unauthenticated queries is simply opening a security hole. Which is
asking for trouble.
--
Eugene
http://www.gershnik.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Howto get workgroup name
- From: Eugene Gershnik
- Re: Howto get workgroup name
- References:
- Howto get workgroup name
- From: Mila
- Re: Howto get workgroup name
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- Re: Howto get workgroup name
- From: Mila
- Re: Howto get workgroup name
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- Re: Howto get workgroup name
- From: Eugene Gershnik
- Howto get workgroup name
- Prev by Date: Re: select()
- Next by Date: FwpmSubLayerAdd0
- Previous by thread: Re: Howto get workgroup name
- Next by thread: Re: Howto get workgroup name
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading