Re: UDP datagrams - Possible to check for broadcast ?
- From: "R.Wieser" <address@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:24:25 +0100
Arkady Frenkel <arkadyf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in berichtnieuws
eP6TLEB9FHA.1292@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Arkady,
> Vadim meant to check nibbles in sin_addr struct member of sockaddr struct
> Arkady
That is what I did : 0F01A8C0 is the content of the sin_addr -field of the
remote-sockets SockAddr record. 0F is the low byte of the senders IP.
Am I missing something here ?
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: UDP datagrams - Possible to check for broadcast ?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- Re: UDP datagrams - Possible to check for broadcast ?
- References:
- UDP datagrams - Possible to check for broadcast ?
- From: R.Wieser
- Re: UDP datagrams - Possible to check for broadcast ?
- From: Vadym Stetsyak
- Re: UDP datagrams - Possible to check for broadcast ?
- From: R.Wieser
- Re: UDP datagrams - Possible to check for broadcast ?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- UDP datagrams - Possible to check for broadcast ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about PfAddFilterToInterface
- Next by Date: Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- Previous by thread: Re: UDP datagrams - Possible to check for broadcast ?
- Next by thread: Re: UDP datagrams - Possible to check for broadcast ?
- Index(es):