Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: "R.Wieser" <address@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:08:07 +0100
Arkady Frenkel <arkadyf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in berichtnieuws
#WLcVnC9FHA.2264@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Arkady,
> P.S. BTW Police officer ( in this case RFC sure not me :) describe
> that maybe not clearly enough but "This gives the TCP protection
> against misrouted segments" ( RFC ) is the explanation.
I'm sorry, but no ammount of effort on my part in trying to explain what I
want does seem to help ....
Your above answer is as correct as the "because otherwise it does not
function" one, but allso does *not* answer my question.
I'm asking why the calculation has been designed as it curently is, nothing
more, nothing less.
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: Alexander Nickolov
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- References:
- UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: R.Wieser
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: R.Wieser
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: R.Wieser
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: R.Wieser
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- Prev by Date: Re: UDP datagrams - Possible to check for broadcast ?
- Next by Date: Network config change events?
- Previous by thread: Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- Next by thread: Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- Index(es):