Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: "R.Wieser" <address@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:41:36 +0100
Arkady Frenkel <arkadyf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in berichtnieuws
e7DADr#8FHA.2192@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Arkady,
> Additionally , on RFC793 that starts on last line of page 15 and continue
to
> page 16 :
>
> The checksum also covers a 96 bit pseudo header conceptually
Thanks for your responses. Yes, I saw that one too. However, none of the
"this is how you calculate the checksum for ...." tell me anything about the
*why* of using the UDP-length double :-( :-)
By the way : the sending & recieving of the UDP-packets to/from a
Windows-machine goes o.k., so I guess the checksum-calculation is o.k too.
:-)
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- References:
- UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: R.Wieser
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: R.Wieser
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- Prev by Date: Re: How to translate UNC to local path name.
- Next by Date: Re: UDP datagrams - Possible to check for broadcast ?
- Previous by thread: Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- Next by thread: Re: UDP checksum calculation - uses lenght twice ?
- Index(es):
Loading