Re: Does "send" block after a successfuly "select" ?
- From: "Arkady Frenkel" <arkadyf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:40:45 +0200
If you use non-blocking one ( I appreciate you are ) because that one you
use in select , you willn't blocked
Arkady
"ddh" <doudehou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1131937692.254046.72880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi,
>
> Suppose I use "select" to wait many SOCKETs for writing, then after
> select return, and I got some SOCKETs which are ready for writing. Then
> if I use send() to send a big mount of bytes, does send() will block on
> it? If so, is it necessary to use a separate send() thread for every
> SOCKET? I don't want to use WSAxxxSelect() because of portablity.
>
>
> Thank you very much for your help.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Changing TTL of incoming packets?
- Next by Date: connection pooling
- Previous by thread: Does "send" block after a successfuly "select" ?
- Next by thread: Re: Does "send" block after a successfuly "select" ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|