Re: Firewalls and ephemeral ports
- From: "Arkady Frenkel" <arkadyf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:46:52 +0200
If unix do it incrementally , you are lucky and need only open range of
ports in your f/w , otherwise you are in problem ( unless you'll decide to
turn it off :) ). BTW both those you can do programmatically
Arkady
"Mark Perschbacher" <MarkPerschbacher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:65B4AAB2-E6EF-47D8-BA13-560169C697D5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sorry for the confusion, we are using TCP. What is happening is the UNIX
> server is incrementing its local ports as we send sequential data, and the
> firewall is seeing ACK's coming back toward us with the same destination
> address, but different sending port numbers, and is blocking them.
>
> "Phil Frisbie, Jr." wrote:
>
>> Mark Perschbacher wrote:
>>
>> > Several months ago, I posted a question about an issue I am having with
>> > a
>> > tcp/ip connection between our W2003 server and a UNIX box. The issue
>> > is the
>> > UNIX side sits behind a firewall which is blocking data transmission
>> > because
>> > of the ephemeral port connection,ie; a datagram is sent on port x, the
>> > next
>> > is on port x2, the firewall sees this change and blocks it. It is a
>> > global
>> > setting on the firewall. I just read that ftp connections can be
>> > configured
>> > in passive mode. Can this be done for tcp/ip?
>>
>> Which TCP/IP protocol are you using? UDP or TCP?
>>
>> At first you refer to a connection which would lead me to think you are
>> using
>> TCP, but then you talk about datagrams which are UDP, so please explain
>> more!
>>
>> And I still have no idea why you think firewall blocking has anything to
>> do with
>> ephemeral ports.
>>
>> --
>> Phil Frisbie, Jr.
>> Hawk Software
>> http://www.hawksoft.com
>>
.
- References:
- Re: Firewalls and ephemeral ports
- From: Phil Frisbie, Jr.
- Re: Firewalls and ephemeral ports
- Prev by Date: Re: Client VPN connection
- Next by Date: Re: Firewalls and ephemeral ports
- Previous by thread: Re: Firewalls and ephemeral ports
- Next by thread: Re: Firewalls and ephemeral ports
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|