Re: Error in send, while using IP_HDRINCL

Hi, in advance...
"Eugene Gershnik" <gershnik@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eoq1PUqoFHA.3984@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Arkady Frenkel wrote:
>> "Eugene Gershnik" <gershnik@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:%23SDWavboFHA.3300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Arkady Frenkel wrote:
>>>> They do use drivers , but to install driver you have to be
>>>> administrator and answer for Find new device Device Manager dialog
>>>> in the case your driver not signed ( hard to believe that hacker
>>>> will do all the procedure of WHQL :) )
>>>
>>> And MS could do exactly the same precautions for an app that uses raw
>>> sockets. That is require a privilege normally held by admins only
>>> (or even
>>
>> The only computers which are not admins at home are computers of the
>> family members of IT administrators , they say :"In my family only I
>> can be administrator!" :)
>
> Same holds for the current situation. Most home users I know work as
> admins and happily click Ok on any warning they got.
>
>>> local system only) and popping up a dialog when a raw socket is
>>> requested by an application for the first time.
>>>
>>> Instead they have chosen the easy way (for them) that hurts other
>>> developers.
>>>
>> Before the year and half , when MS guys shows the upcoming changes of
>> SP2 in Redmond I warned them with sentence :"By that you'll cause
>> network students move to linux" , at the end they leave the UDP
>> option at least.
>
> OT: AFAIK all students and researchers are already on Linux. Have you seen
> any interesting Windows network utility or tool in the last few years that
> wasn't ported from Linux?
>
>> Agree with you that it's not the best way and that
>> hurt the white hackers( developers ) , so if the as many as possible
>> of us will write to sdkfdbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx about that , IMHO, the
>> changes will be done for that.
>
BTW the Sudesh wrote that they can't read with raw sockets and that due to
docs do allowed in SP2 too , so that realcandidate for mail to address above
Arkady

>
> Hmmm. Might be worth a try.
>
> --
> Eugene
> http://www.gershnik.com
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Error in send, while using IP_HDRINCL
    ... > Arkady Frenkel wrote: ... >>> And MS could do exactly the same precautions for an app that uses raw ... >>> sockets. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.networks)
  • Re: How to increase the performance of lynxOS
    ... >I am using Lynx 4.0.0 and raw soxckets are at IP level. ... that raw IP sockets behave slightly differently on BSD-derived ... in the Linux stack. ...
    (comp.os.lynx)
  • Re: Http server implementation for Windows Media Server
    ... On that level that already extra raw data even not ... similar problem applies to me as would happen with raw sockets. ... I'm assuming you are using a raw TCP ... the packets aren't ACKed because ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.networks)
  • Raw Socket Sender
    ... I must say I'm new to these Raw sockets in C# and unfortunantly I haven't met ... I set up my packet reciever which recieves RAW IP packets and dumps ... A blocking operation was interrupted by a call to ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Sending raw sockets without administrative privileges?
    ... Hello Christian Jacob cjacob AT nospam toptechnologies DOT de, ... as sending raw sockets on XP SP2 and W2K3 SP1 should be disabled ... > sockets to send ICMP echo requests. ... > This is why it simply does not work with user permissions. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.security)