Re: TCP answers with ACK and PSH
From: Alexander Nickolov (agnickolov_at_mvps.org)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: bandreasen: "Share Permissions on an NT Computer"
- Previous message: Alexander Nickolov: "Re: Packet Analyzing (getting source application)"
- In reply to: Tucker: "RE: TCP answers with ACK and PSH"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:47:37 -0800
OP's talking about the delayed ACK algorithm not working,
not about the presense of a PSH flag.
-- ===================================== Alexander Nickolov Microsoft MVP [VC], MCSD email: agnickolov@mvps.org MVP VC FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq ===================================== "Tucker" <Tucker@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:21A4B777-0174-4E07-AB2B-6CCDA0D3C097@microsoft.com... > From everything I have read, the PUSH flag is ignored. Berkeley > implementations ignore recieved PUSHs because they never delay the > delivery > anyway. It would seem that the PSH frame is nothing more than noise on > the > network and has no impact on the application's performance > > "lexa" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to increase the performance of my network application. My >> packet tracer shows me that every packet is acknowledged by an single ACK >> packet and than follows the answer data packet with the PSH flag. Thats >> ok, >> but other applikations are moer performant because they combine the >> acknowledgement with the data packet--> both flags are set (ACK and >> PSH).The >> negiotation parameter MSS 1460 Windowsize 64240 are the same and SACK is >> allowed. >> How can I force my winsock application to send the ACK with the data >> packet >> (PSH) ? >> >> lexa
- Next message: bandreasen: "Share Permissions on an NT Computer"
- Previous message: Alexander Nickolov: "Re: Packet Analyzing (getting source application)"
- In reply to: Tucker: "RE: TCP answers with ACK and PSH"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|