Re: LSP bypass method - pls help
From: Jorge Cercadillo (JorgeCercadillo_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 01/19/05
- Next message: Jorge Cercadillo: "Re: LSP bypass method - pls help"
- Previous message: JasonSCC: "Re: Map drive for all users"
- Next in thread: Jorge Cercadillo: "Re: LSP bypass method - pls help"
- Reply: Jorge Cercadillo: "Re: LSP bypass method - pls help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 06:21:06 -0800
Yeah, thats true.
What I do now, if I detect there are calls in that socket after WSPSocket, I
pass it directly to the lower level provider. For that, I keep I list of
[Socket, pointer to lower level provider] in WSPSocket call, that I use later
if needed.
> Yes, I am aware of this method also, but this one has a trade-off: your
> LSP has to be always on top. If there is another LSP over your LSP the
> bypassed applications won't work, that is why I have chosen the other
> method that doesn't have this trade-off.
>
> Viv
>
> >A good method for bypassing some processes in your LSP is to return the lower
> >provider socket in WSPSocket. Winsock will bypass you automatically in all
> >the others call made to that socket.
> >
> >It works in W95/98/ME/NT/2K/XP.
> >
> >You must change your WSPStartup also, because you don't need to Initialize
> >the Overlapped and Asyncronous Threads.
- Next message: Jorge Cercadillo: "Re: LSP bypass method - pls help"
- Previous message: JasonSCC: "Re: Map drive for all users"
- Next in thread: Jorge Cercadillo: "Re: LSP bypass method - pls help"
- Reply: Jorge Cercadillo: "Re: LSP bypass method - pls help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|