Re: Strange problem drive me mad.
From: Steven Tang (steven.tang_at_tlvsys.com)
Date: 12/27/04
- Previous message: Eugene Gershnik: "Re: IP Helper functions and related..."
- In reply to: Alexander Nickolov: "Re: Strange problem drive me mad."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 01:12:38 -0800
Thanks!!!
Regards
Steven.
"Alexander Nickolov" <agnickolov@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:uQNFoqs6EHA.2540@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Definitely not. Simply read all data available on each
> notification, then chop it into packets. BTW, the data
> is dropped by your code, not by the TCP layer.
>
> --
> =====================================
> Alexander Nickolov
> Microsoft MVP [VC], MCSD
> email: agnickolov@mvps.org
> MVP VC FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq
> =====================================
> "Steven Tang" <steven.tang@tlvsys.com> wrote in message
> news:eTYi2Oi6EHA.1260@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks for reply, actually, the problem is that client (may caused by
>> server)
>> always flush data before I decode the each packet when buffer is full. Is
>> it
>> possible I disable data's aggregating and so that I can get FD_READ
>> message
>> per packet? I means that get each FD_READ by each calling to "send"at
>> server
>> side.
>>
>> Regards
>> Steven
>> "Alexander Nickolov" <agnickolov@mvps.org> wrote in message
>> news:%23gU%23T3h6EHA.2452@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>> Not through the TCP protocol. You can design your
>>> own packetization on top of TCP, though.
>>>
>>> --
>>> =====================================
>>> Alexander Nickolov
>>> Microsoft MVP [VC], MCSD
>>> email: agnickolov@mvps.org
>>> MVP VC FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq
>>> =====================================
>>> "Steven Tang" <steven.tang@tlvsys.com> wrote in message
>>> news:eCHrJMf6EHA.3236@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>>>>I found the problem was caused client side recv aggregated the all
>>>> data to one. Is it possible to deny this kind of aggregate?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Steven
>>>>
>>>> "Steven Tang" <steven.tang@tlvsys.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:eHL7pCa6EHA.2012@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>> I'm being bothered by one very strange socket problem. I created one
>>>>> server
>>>>> and one client with TCP winsock, I forwarded both ASync events to
>>>>> their window.
>>>>> and I handle traffic behaviour inside notifination message.
>>>>> What I want to do is: when server get one message data from client,
>>>>> it send
>>>>> back 10 buffers data to client. the server code look like these:
>>>>>
>>>>> for ( int i = 0; i < 10; i ++ ) {
>>>>> ....
>>>>> int lenPack = length of the buffer i
>>>>> int iRetLen = send( clisock, Number i data buffer, , 0 );
>>>>> OutputDebugMsg( iRetLen, lenPack, \n );
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> The client side is just receive the data in the notification message.
>>>>>
>>>>> when I run server and the client, the client shows only got one data
>>>>> packet
>>>>> from the server.
>>>>> when I run the client, line by line trace the above code in server
>>>>> side. the
>>>>> client shows it got all 10 data packets.
>>>>> I added some traces code to the server and the client then run them
>>>>> automatically,
>>>>> the server side debug message terminal shows all ten data are send out
>>>>> successfully
>>>>> ( iRetLen == lenPack every time). while at client side, the terminal
>>>>> shows
>>>>> the client only get one notification message.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any comments are very appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Steven
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
- Previous message: Eugene Gershnik: "Re: IP Helper functions and related..."
- In reply to: Alexander Nickolov: "Re: Strange problem drive me mad."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
