Re: Async ReadFile

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Arkady Frenkel (arkadyf_at_hotmailxdotx.com)
Date: 10/21/04 

Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:36:45 +0200

Due to http://computercops.biz/LSPs.html that have V , what is problematic
in it , Alexander?
Arkady

"Alexander Nickolov" <agnickolov@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:O7tWg74tEHA.2596@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > Some third-party LSPs are very good indeed. You tend to hear mostly
about
> > the ones that aren't - the ones that are very good, you (as an
application
> > developer) shouldn't even be aware that they have been installed.
>
> Yeah, the worst offender I know of is VLSP.DLL...
>
> --
> =====================================
> Alexander Nickolov
> Microsoft MVP [VC], MCSD
> email: agnickolov@mvps.org
> MVP VC FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq
> =====================================
>
> "Alun Jones [MSFT]" <alunj@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:uehvqS4tEHA.2808@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> > "Slava M. Usov" <stripit.slough@gmx.net> wrote in message
> > news:%2396NtJ3tEHA.3476@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> >> Need I repeat that the _stock_ _TCP_ sockets are LSP-nonsense-free?
> >
> > That's very nice if you can guarantee that everyone running your
> > application will be running a stock OS. One of the joys of Windows is
> > that you can install more than one application on it. If you are
> > developing an in-house project, to be run on computers that must satisfy
> > your requirements, then it may be appropriate to make "no LSPs" one
> > requirement of your installation policy, and write your code without
> > considering whether or not an LSP is present.
> >
> > However, if you're writing for a less-controlled environment, either
> > general distribution, or for future-protection (your company may find a
> > very good use for an LSP next month), it's worth taking into
consideration
> > that replaceable or stackable components of the OS may be replaced or
> > stacked.
> >
> >> Then, given the quality of third-party user-mode LSPs, the extra
overhead
> >> caused by a couple of KM transitions will be well below the
> >> instrumentation
> >> jitter.
> >
> > Some third-party LSPs are very good indeed. You tend to hear mostly
about
> > the ones that aren't - the ones that are very good, you (as an
application
> > developer) shouldn't even be aware that they have been installed.
> >
> > Alun.
> > ~~~~
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Async ReadFile
    ... >> developer) shouldn't even be aware that they have been installed. ... > Alexander Nickolov ... >> that you can install more than one application on it. ... >> considering whether or not an LSP is present. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
  • Re: How to make application work on Symbol MC3000?
    ... My applications would work on a Symbol MC9000 and Dell Axim running ... their SDK and it solved the problem. ... Developer Kit for .Net v1.2. ... install the application on the device so it will run properly. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework)
  • Re: NVIDIA Again (Mike Noble
    ... > (Alexander Dalloz) ... > EndSection ... > hello guys, I am completely new in Linux, How do I install the driver? ... >>since I don't have a scanner now, maybe I should look into buying a ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Still Getting Runtime Error Message
    ... To Check References, did you go to Modules then Tools References? ... an add in supplied with my developer ed that makes this easy. ... > software, install ... even testing over and over on a test mule is not ...
    (microsoft.public.access.devtoolkits)
  • Re: App for Windows 98?
    ... can get just the Developer Edition for Office XP, ... Windows XP, but I'm getting requests to produce a version that will ... a2000 format (note that the default format for a2003 is in fact ... You can use sagekey to build a install here...but sagkey changes ...
    (microsoft.public.access.gettingstarted)