Re: 8159 bytes takes 20 ms, 8160 bytes takes 200 ms?
From: Alexander Nickolov (agnickolov_at_mvps.org)
Date: 10/13/04
- Next message: Derek: "Transparent communication by way of proxy?"
- Previous message: hyu: "LSP on Windows 2003 domain controller"
- In reply to: Arkady Frenkel: "Re: 8159 bytes takes 20 ms, 8160 bytes takes 200 ms?"
- Next in thread: Itjalve: "RE: 8159 bytes takes 20 ms, 8160 bytes takes 200 ms?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:19:20 -0700
Actually, that would be delayed ACK, since there's no data in
the ACK packet.
-- ===================================== Alexander Nickolov Microsoft MVP [VC], MCSD email: agnickolov@mvps.org MVP VC FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq ===================================== "Arkady Frenkel" <arkadyf@hotmailxdotxcom> wrote in message news:e6dpK2PsEHA.3076@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Nagle always with us :) , look for Nagle algorithm in TCP > Arkady > > "Itjalve" <itjalve@hotmail.com.(donotspam)> wrote in message > news:2E997F61-BFFA-49E0-B0DE-5876E692943C@microsoft.com... >> Win2k communicating with an embedded system via a point-to-point link > using >> tcp winsock. 8159 bytes (7 fragments) takes about 20 milli seconds, 8160 >> bytes (8 fragments) takes about 200 milli seconds. >> >> Its looks like that win2k waits about 150 ms before ack the last, 8, >> fragment. Is this a win2k problem or is it my application that is slow? >> >> I have checked my code for delays, but I can't find any problems there, > i'm >> waiting for packets and the cpu load is less than 10%. >> >> // >> this is what etheral shows, a packet with ack and push flag set, and >> win2k >> (192.168.125.2) waits 0.15s before sending the ack >> // >> >> No. Time Source Destination Protocol > Info >> 47727 36.458361 192.168.125.1 192.168.125.2 TCP >> 5515 > 2179 [PSH, ACK] Seq=2400562144 Ack=2286139454 Win=8192 Len=304 >> >> Frame 47727 (358 bytes on wire, 358 bytes captured) >> Arrival Time: Oct 13, 2004 08:13:02.001731000 >> Time delta from previous packet: 0.000535000 seconds >> Time since reference or first frame: 36.458361000 seconds >> Frame Number: 47727 >> Packet Length: 358 bytes >> Capture Length: 358 bytes >> Ethernet II, Src: 00:00:23:08:80:33, Dst: 00:04:76:22:89:fe >> Destination: 00:04:76:22:89:fe (00:04:76:22:89:fe) >> Source: 00:00:23:08:80:33 (00:00:23:08:80:33) >> Type: IP (0x0800) >> Internet Protocol, Src Addr: 192.168.125.1 (192.168.125.1), Dst Addr: >> 192.168.125.2 (192.168.125.2) >> Version: 4 >> Header length: 20 bytes >> Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP 0x00: Default; ECN: 0x00) >> 0000 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Default (0x00) >> .... ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0 >> .... ...0 = ECN-CE: 0 >> Total Length: 344 >> Identification: 0x2384 (9092) >> Flags: 0x04 (Don't Fragment) >> 0... = Reserved bit: Not set >> .1.. = Don't fragment: Set >> ..0. = More fragments: Not set >> Fragment offset: 0 >> Time to live: 64 >> Protocol: TCP (0x06) >> Header checksum: 0x9ac7 (correct) >> Source: 192.168.125.1 (192.168.125.1) >> Destination: 192.168.125.2 (192.168.125.2) >> Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 5515 (5515), Dst Port: 2179 > (2179), >> Seq: 2400562144, Ack: 2286139454, Len: 304 >> Source port: 5515 (5515) >> Destination port: 2179 (2179) >> Sequence number: 2400562144 >> Next sequence number: 2400562448 >> Acknowledgement number: 2286139454 >> Header length: 20 bytes >> Flags: 0x0018 (PSH, ACK) >> 0... .... = Congestion Window Reduced (CWR): Not set >> .0.. .... = ECN-Echo: Not set >> ..0. .... = Urgent: Not set >> ...1 .... = Acknowledgment: Set >> .... 1... = Push: Set >> .... .0.. = Reset: Not set >> .... ..0. = Syn: Not set >> .... ...0 = Fin: Not set >> Window size: 8192 >> Checksum: 0x91d9 (correct) >> Data (304 bytes) >> >> >> No. Time Source Destination Protocol > Info >> 47728 36.609320 192.168.125.2 192.168.125.1 TCP >> 2179 > 5515 [ACK] Seq=2286139454 Ack=2400562448 Win=17216 [CHECKSUM >> INCORRECT] Len=0 >> >> Frame 47728 (54 bytes on wire, 54 bytes captured) >> Arrival Time: Oct 13, 2004 08:13:02.152690000 >> Time delta from previous packet: 0.150959000 seconds >> Time since reference or first frame: 36.609320000 seconds >> Frame Number: 47728 >> Packet Length: 54 bytes >> Capture Length: 54 bytes >> Ethernet II, Src: 00:04:76:22:89:fe, Dst: 00:00:23:08:80:33 >> Destination: 00:00:23:08:80:33 (00:00:23:08:80:33) >> Source: 00:04:76:22:89:fe (00:04:76:22:89:fe) >> Type: IP (0x0800) >> Internet Protocol, Src Addr: 192.168.125.2 (192.168.125.2), Dst Addr: >> 192.168.125.1 (192.168.125.1) >> Version: 4 >> Header length: 20 bytes >> Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP 0x00: Default; ECN: 0x00) >> 0000 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Default (0x00) >> .... ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0 >> .... ...0 = ECN-CE: 0 >> Total Length: 40 >> Identification: 0xf909 (63753) >> Flags: 0x04 (Don't Fragment) >> 0... = Reserved bit: Not set >> .1.. = Don't fragment: Set >> ..0. = More fragments: Not set >> Fragment offset: 0 >> Time to live: 128 >> Protocol: TCP (0x06) >> Header checksum: 0x0000 (incorrect, should be 0x8671) >> Source: 192.168.125.2 (192.168.125.2) >> Destination: 192.168.125.1 (192.168.125.1) >> Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 2179 (2179), Dst Port: 5515 > (5515), >> Seq: 2286139454, Ack: 2400562448, Len: 0 >> Source port: 2179 (2179) >> Destination port: 5515 (5515) >> Sequence number: 2286139454 >> Acknowledgement number: 2400562448 >> Header length: 20 bytes >> Flags: 0x0010 (ACK) >> 0... .... = Congestion Window Reduced (CWR): Not set >> .0.. .... = ECN-Echo: Not set >> ..0. .... = Urgent: Not set >> ...1 .... = Acknowledgment: Set >> .... 0... = Push: Not set >> .... .0.. = Reset: Not set >> .... ..0. = Syn: Not set >> .... ...0 = Fin: Not set >> Window size: 17216 >> Checksum: 0x7b6f (incorrect, should be 0x5689) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
- Next message: Derek: "Transparent communication by way of proxy?"
- Previous message: hyu: "LSP on Windows 2003 domain controller"
- In reply to: Arkady Frenkel: "Re: 8159 bytes takes 20 ms, 8160 bytes takes 200 ms?"
- Next in thread: Itjalve: "RE: 8159 bytes takes 20 ms, 8160 bytes takes 200 ms?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|