Sliding windows on XP and 2K don't???
From: Steve Alpert (sra_at_newsgroups.nospam)
Date: 07/14/04
- Next message: Allan Kardec: "Re: How to monitor consumption of CPU of a process?"
- Previous message: David: "Server can receive in a socket, but what it sends isn't received in the client."
- Next in thread: Chris P. [MVP]: "Re: Sliding windows on XP and 2K don't???"
- Reply: Chris P. [MVP]: "Re: Sliding windows on XP and 2K don't???"
- Reply: Alun Jones [MSFT]: "Re: Sliding windows on XP and 2K don't???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:26:18 -0400
We've been trying to speed up an application and have looked at a few
sniffs and have found that when we're talking to a host (apparently with
Nagle enabled), Windows XP will not transmit a second packet until a
first packet has been ack'ed! We send a packet of about 30 bytes
followed almost immediately by a send of another packet of about 300
bytes and the second always waits until the server has ack'ed the first
one? How come?
These packet sizes are certainly small enough that the sliding window
should come into play.
/steveA
-- Steve Alpert my email Fgrir_Nycreg @ vqk.pbz is encrypted with ROT13 (www.rot13.org) and spaces
- Next message: Allan Kardec: "Re: How to monitor consumption of CPU of a process?"
- Previous message: David: "Server can receive in a socket, but what it sends isn't received in the client."
- Next in thread: Chris P. [MVP]: "Re: Sliding windows on XP and 2K don't???"
- Reply: Chris P. [MVP]: "Re: Sliding windows on XP and 2K don't???"
- Reply: Alun Jones [MSFT]: "Re: Sliding windows on XP and 2K don't???"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|