Re: Working around UAC for AccessCheck API, how?
- From: "Garfield Lewis" <galewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:32:04 -0400
np.. :-)
--
Garfield A. Lewis
DB2 UDB Development,
IBM Canada Laboratory
"Stefan Kuhr" <kustt110@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ek$ezqjwIHA.3860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Garfield,
Garfield Lewis wrote:
Try using the linked token, TOKEN_LINKED_TOKEN
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb530719(VS.85).aspx).
You may also need this info as well:
http://blogs.msdn.com/vistacompatteam/archive/2007/04/18/c2065-token-linked-token-undeclared-identifier.aspx
Works like a charm. Thank you!
--
S
.
- References:
- Working around UAC for AccessCheck API, how?
- From: Stefan Kuhr
- Re: Working around UAC for AccessCheck API, how?
- From: Garfield Lewis
- Re: Working around UAC for AccessCheck API, how?
- From: Stefan Kuhr
- Working around UAC for AccessCheck API, how?
- Prev by Date: shared memory overhead (using CreateFileMapping(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE))
- Next by Date: Win32 Service not getting PNP Notification
- Previous by thread: Re: Working around UAC for AccessCheck API, how?
- Next by thread: XP: query BIOS Info(Name) via API - as in SystemInfo
- Index(es):