Re: Terminal Services
- From: "m" <m@xxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:45:51 -0400
<snip>
TS is part of the OS; what did you expect?
Why should this make a difference?
because the OS has a feature (multiple terminals using FSU / RDP) not a
framework to implement an application
For example, the system pagefile is a feature of the OS. Other than
configuring the sizes & locations, applications have no influence over what
the OS does with it.
By contrast, GDI is a framework that can be used by applications to provide
a GUI. In a simple application, most of the work is done by DefWindowProc,
but control over how DefWindowProc operates belongs to the application (i.e.
the OS does not create windows for the application, but does service the
mouse input for windows that the application creates)
The fact that applications written for Windows must be aware, or blissfully
ignorant, of the fact that there may be zero or many window stations,
desktops, monitors, etc. is directly analogous to applications being aware
or ignorant of the pagefile configuration.
Microsoft could have implemented a framework for TS but experiences like
GINA have shown that this is usually a bad idea.
<snip>
.
- References:
- Terminal Services
- From: Alex
- Re: Terminal Services
- From: Pavel A.
- Re: Terminal Services
- From: Alex
- Re: Terminal Services
- From: Pavel A.
- Re: Terminal Services
- From: Alex
- Re: Terminal Services
- From: Tim Roberts
- Re: Terminal Services
- From: Alex
- Re: Terminal Services
- From: Don Burn
- Re: Terminal Services
- From: Alex
- Re: Terminal Services
- From: m
- Re: Terminal Services
- From: Alex
- Terminal Services
- Prev by Date: Re: Terminal Services
- Next by Date: Re: Find out if monitor is off
- Previous by thread: Re: Terminal Services
- Next by thread: Re: Terminal Services
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|