Re: fixed time slices?
- From: "Jan Bruns" <testzugang_janbruns@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:22:17 +0200
"Jan Bruns":
From within the callback-procedure, a loop like
for i := 1 to n do sleep(s); // s>0
takes about n*(s+1) ms. What's difrent with this thread?
This is also true for the main thread that called timeBeginPeriod(1).
Is this relyable behaviour? Why does my application need
to call timeBeginPeriod(1) to make the kernel behave as parts of
the SDK define?
Gruss
Jan Bruns
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fixed time slices?
- From: Arkady Frenkel
- Re: fixed time slices?
- From: m
- Re: fixed time slices?
- References:
- fixed time slices?
- From: Jan Bruns
- Re: fixed time slices?
- From: Don Burn
- Re: fixed time slices?
- From: m
- Re: fixed time slices?
- From: Jan Bruns
- fixed time slices?
- Prev by Date: Re: fixed time slices?
- Next by Date: Re: Canonical ACL ordering
- Previous by thread: Re: fixed time slices?
- Next by thread: Re: fixed time slices?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|