Re: undestroyable process
- From: "James Brown" <not@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:04:07 -0000
"azsx" <radu_plugaru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1162247543.048754.301380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You started this topic on another forum and got the exact same response -:) indeed. It's just - i know for sure that there must be a way. Why
people's answers aren't going to change no matter how many times you ask.
don't you agree that pure techniqly it is possible? There are critical
system processes?!
They might be 'critical' but as an administrator I can stop them / kill
them. Sure, it will break the system, but it not possible to stop an
administrator doing whatever he/she wants. There are some pieces of software
out there - notable things like ZoneAlarm or other security-related
softwares - which install hooks to prevent people killing the program via
TaskManager. But even though the admin can't use TaskManager any longer,
this doesn't mean he can't fire up his kernel-debugger and kill the process
that way.
Once again: By definition, the Administrator has complete control over his
system. It is *impossible* to prevent the Adminstrator from killing any
process on his system.
--
James Brown
Microsoft MVP - Windows SDK
www.catch22.net
Free Win32 Tutorials and Sourcecode
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: undestroyable process
- From: azsx
- Re: undestroyable process
- References:
- undestroyable process
- From: azsx
- Re: undestroyable process
- From: James Brown
- Re: undestroyable process
- From: azsx
- Re: undestroyable process
- From: James Brown
- Re: undestroyable process
- From: azsx
- undestroyable process
- Prev by Date: Re: undestroyable process
- Next by Date: Re: intercept a specific exception
- Previous by thread: Re: undestroyable process
- Next by thread: Re: undestroyable process
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|