Re: Inline assembler reference
- From: "anton bassov"<xxx@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 01:58:20 -0500
Hi David
I am surprised - you got this correct.
Thank you so much for your "compliment"
You can get a good profile by
repeating the test many times and then interrupts will >average out on a
dedicated test system
I would say such profiling can be quite helpfull in identifying your own
bottlenecks, but still it is not really indicative of how your program may
behave on the real system (for the simple reason that its performance may
vary on different systems and under the different circumstances). Again, the
story is the same - for example,your own code got,say, 20% improvement, but
how will this improvement be perceived by users??? Probably, it just did not
make sense to go through all trouble of writing assembly code - from the
user's perspective, the improvement can be so insignificant that he/she will
never even notice it
Anton Bassov
.
- References:
- Re: Inline assembler reference
- From: David J. Craig
- Re: Inline assembler reference
- Prev by Date: Re: APIENTRY vs WINAPI
- Next by Date: Re: Inline assembler reference
- Previous by thread: Re: Inline assembler reference
- Next by thread: Re: Inline assembler reference
- Index(es):