Re: mutex question
- From: "Slava M. Usov" <stripit.slough@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:32:34 +0200
"Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]" <tom_usenet@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uAKjiq3cGHA.4428@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Slava M. Usov wrote:
[...]
Reads and writes did happen; your "corrupt" involves an ad hoc
assumption -- the atomicity of reads and writes.
It's neither ad hoc nor an assumption, but a requirement of "sufficient".
Atomicity is a requirement for reading or writing? This is not even funny.
[...]
Semantic arguments about the exact meaning of "useful" and "useless"
aside, what is the use of volatile in multithreading?
The 'volatile' keyword is useful with or without multithreading. For a
particular example involving multithreading, read the first message you
responded to in this thread.
S
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: mutex question
- From: anton bassov
- Re: mutex question
- From: Tom Widmer
- Re: mutex question
- References:
- Re: mutex question
- From: David Jones
- Re: mutex question
- From: Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]
- Re: mutex question
- From: Slava M. Usov
- Re: mutex question
- From: Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]
- Re: mutex question
- From: Slava M. Usov
- Re: mutex question
- From: Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]
- Re: mutex question
- From: Slava M. Usov
- Re: mutex question
- From: Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]
- Re: mutex question
- From: Slava M. Usov
- Re: mutex question
- From: Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]
- Re: mutex question
- From: Slava M. Usov
- Re: mutex question
- From: Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]
- Re: mutex question
- Prev by Date: Re: mutex question
- Next by Date: Re: mutex question
- Previous by thread: Re: mutex question
- Next by thread: Re: mutex question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading