Re: Forcing data into RAM memory only?

"anton bassov" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3b238b84d6414cc4a9d542d0e96d31f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Slava

Please look at AllocateUserPhysicalPages()' documentation - the statement
below is taken from it

//////////////////
64-bit Windows on Itanium-based systems: Due to the difference in page
sizes, AllocateUserPhysicalPages is not supported for 32-bit applications
/////////////////

MapUserPhysicalPages() and MapUserPhysicalPagesScatter()documentation
makes similar statements. Apparently, some more "ad hoc assumptions" by
MSDN

Begin transmission.

M. O. R. E. Blank. F. A. U. L. T. Y. Blank. L. O. G. I. C. Period.

End transmission.

I wonder whether I should request my correspondent to acknowledge the
reception of this message, apparently it is not getting through.

You originally "were afraid" that AWE required more than 4G of RAM.

This quotation means "a 32-bit application running on 64-bit Itanium systems
cannot use AWE".

S


.