Re: Re:How To Suspend Thread In Kernel?
- From: "anton bassov"<xxx@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 02:38:51 -0600
Hi Vladimir
I am really glad that there is at least one person who understands what I
mean. You seem to be the only one on this thread who understands that
sometimes we come across problems that cannot be solved by any officially
supported means - anyone in the right state of mind would not play such
tricks just for the fun of doing it, don't you think???
Such trick is dangerous, and I can foresee quite a few problems using it (at
least directly- probably, it may require quite a few additional
modifications). This is definitely not a solution that wins you MS awards -
I don't want to even argue about that. However, what is the alternative
solution???
Everyone on this thread says that this is dangerous trick, but no one came
up with any alternative proposal so far.
You seem to be the only one who has a realistic view of the situation
Regards
Anton Bassov
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re:How To Suspend Thread In Kernel?
- From: Scherbina Vladimir
- Re: Re:How To Suspend Thread In Kernel?
- From: m
- Re: Re:How To Suspend Thread In Kernel?
- References:
- Re: Re:How To Suspend Thread In Kernel?
- From: Scherbina Vladimir
- Re: Re:How To Suspend Thread In Kernel?
- Prev by Date: Re: GetClipboardOwner() fails to return "correct" Clipboard Owner
- Next by Date: Re: Re:CreateToolhelp32Snapshot bad results
- Previous by thread: Re: Re:How To Suspend Thread In Kernel?
- Next by thread: Re: Re:How To Suspend Thread In Kernel?
- Index(es):