Re: Why is an OS kernel usually written in C?
- From: "Eugene Gershnik" <gershnik@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 09:55:41 -0800
Tim Roberts wrote:
"Eugene Gershnik" <gershnik@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
m wrote:
This is the same argument as before.
Huh? I don't recall anybody including myself making this argument
before.
I _think_ "m" was referring to the "should one do C++ in the Windows
kernel" argument.
Could be. But this has nothing to do with the point I was making. Note that
I said nothing about "should".
Almost all of the drivers I write are in C++, and that
will continue to be the case.
I don't have a strong opinion on the matter. In any case it all depends on
what is meant by C++.
--
Eugene
http://www.gershnik.com
.
- References:
- Re: Why is an OS kernel usually written in C?
- From: Pavel Lebedinsky [MSFT]
- Re: Why is an OS kernel usually written in C?
- From: Eugene Gershnik
- Re: Why is an OS kernel usually written in C?
- From: m
- Re: Why is an OS kernel usually written in C?
- From: Eugene Gershnik
- Re: Why is an OS kernel usually written in C?
- From: Tim Roberts
- Re: Why is an OS kernel usually written in C?
- Prev by Date: Re: Using RegDeleteKey() to delete RunOnce key in WinXP x64
- Next by Date: Re: Why is an OS kernel usually written in C?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is an OS kernel usually written in C?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is an OS kernel usually written in C?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|