Re: Waitable Timers

From: Gary <debugger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:45:02 +0530

All in one process. The process is running as a service. I am not sure whats going wrong.

Gary.

Scherbina Vladimir wrote:

If he creates timer in another process then he should care about security. Especially when this process is system. I've met a situation when created mutexes (and other objects) under winlogon.exe (winlogon notifcation package) could not be opened from another process because of security issues. SetSecurityInfo with GRANT_ACCESS solves this problem.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Waitable Timers
  - From: Alexander Grigoriev

References:
- Waitable Timers
  - From: Gary
- Re: Waitable Timers
  - From: Alexander Grigoriev
- Re: Waitable Timers
  - From: Scherbina Vladimir

Prev by Date: Re: Waitable Timers
Next by Date: Alignment issues under windows 64 bits
Previous by thread: Re: Waitable Timers
Next by thread: Re: Waitable Timers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: power, corruption and lies
... Whats this got to ... Its totally relevent; security considerations ... system is connected to the internet. ... after the horse has bolted (management decided to buy SCO UnixWare, ...
(Full-Disclosure)
Re: Waitable Timers
... Are you calling any impersonation functions in between? ... > whats going wrong. ... >> package) could not be opened from another process because of security ...
(microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
Re: Completely replace software firewall with hardware firewall?
... >sp2 with the security center with a builtin virewall, whats the point in ... Well, for one thing the WIndows one doesn't check OUTGOING traffic, ...
(alt.computer.security)
Re: Completely replace software firewall with hardware firewall?
... >sp2 with the security center with a builtin virewall, whats the point in ... Well, for one thing the WIndows one doesn't check OUTGOING traffic, ...
(comp.security.firewalls)