Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: "MaxMax" <none@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:03:55 GMT
> Why not use the documented API GetModuleHandle(0) instead of using
> undocumented structures (that will by the way absolutely not work on any
> flavor of Win9x, and won't work "as-is" on 64-bit Windows)?
Because I've relocated the new EXE elsewhere and there isn't a
SetModuleHandle?
--- bye
.
- References:
- "Manually" load an Exe
- From: MaxMax
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: qfel
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: MaxMax
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: qfel
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: MaxMax
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: qfel
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: MaxMax
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: Scherbina Vladimir
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: MaxMax
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: Skywing
- "Manually" load an Exe
- Prev by Date: Re: operator new[] fails in DLL when being called from within VB6 process
- Next by Date: ReadDirectoryChangesW Performance
- Previous by thread: Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- Next by thread: Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- Index(es):