Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: "Skywing" <skywing_NO_SPAM_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:18:49 -0400
Why not use the documented API GetModuleHandle(0) instead of using
undocumented structures (that will by the way absolutely not work on any
flavor of Win9x, and won't work "as-is" on 64-bit Windows)?
"MaxMax" <none@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u9f6f.2465$65.77517@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> API mentioned by you use information stored in PEB (Process environment
>> block). Structure of PEB can be taken here
>> http://undocumented.ntinternals.net/UserMode/Undocumented%20Functions/NT%20Objects/Process/PEB.html
>> You may always change values of PEB fields.
> Very usefull... thanks. Do you know anything equivalent for 9x?
>
> --- bye
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: MaxMax
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- References:
- "Manually" load an Exe
- From: MaxMax
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: qfel
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: MaxMax
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: qfel
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: MaxMax
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: qfel
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: MaxMax
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: Scherbina Vladimir
- Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- From: MaxMax
- "Manually" load an Exe
- Prev by Date: Re: Reasonable values for CRITICAL_SECTION spin-count
- Next by Date: Re: operator new[] fails in DLL when being called from within VB6 process
- Previous by thread: Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- Next by thread: Re: "Manually" load an Exe
- Index(es):