Re: bug in visual studio .net 2003 - breakpoints and memcpy
- From: "Ivan Brugiolo [MSFT]" <ivanbrug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:01:18 -0700
As long as you are not in IA64, where you would soon discover the difference
between
a function descriptor and a function pointer.
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of any included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
"Eugene Gershnik" <gershnik@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23Sj7ZiiiFHA.1244@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Alexander Grigoriev wrote:
>>
>> BTW, converting a function pointer to void * is illegal in C and C++.
>
> Not illegal, just undefined. Which means that an implementation is free to
> define it if it wants so. Both Win32 and Posix define the conversion.
>
>
> --
> Eugene
> http://www.gershnik.com
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: bug in visual studio .net 2003 - breakpoints and memcpy
- From: Eugene Gershnik
- Re: bug in visual studio .net 2003 - breakpoints and memcpy
- References:
- bug in visual studio .net 2003 - breakpoints and memcpy
- From: Gareth Haslip
- Re: bug in visual studio .net 2003 - breakpoints and memcpy
- From: Alexander Grigoriev
- Re: bug in visual studio .net 2003 - breakpoints and memcpy
- From: Eugene Gershnik
- bug in visual studio .net 2003 - breakpoints and memcpy
- Prev by Date: Re: share file handle between app and driver
- Next by Date: Re: bug in visual studio .net 2003 - breakpoints and memcpy
- Previous by thread: Re: bug in visual studio .net 2003 - breakpoints and memcpy
- Next by thread: Re: bug in visual studio .net 2003 - breakpoints and memcpy
- Index(es):