Re: IgnoreHWSerNum redux
From: Doron Holan [MS] (doronh_at_nospam.microsoft.com)
Date: 12/04/04
- Next message: Gary Chanson: "Re: Write-once with DLL shared memory"
- Previous message: Doron Holan [MS]: "Re: Scancode Mapper and sleep/power keys"
- In reply to: Daniel Miller: "IgnoreHWSerNum redux"
- Next in thread: Alexander Grigoriev: "Re: IgnoreHWSerNum redux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 20:49:02 -0800
GlobalDisableSerNumGen controls serial number generation for devices which
do not have them. this key only affects the usb stack that shipped on win2k
. if you device has a serial number, this key does not have an affect.
d
-- Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. this alias is for newsgroup purposes only. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Daniel Miller" <dan@invalid.com> wrote in message news:Xns95B4A77EA441Bdancarddupercom@216.65.98.71... > I've implemented this entry in USBFlags, and it succeeded in my original > requirement, which was adding the physical address to the USB registry > entry for each device. However, it is *also* appending the device serial > number to the key, giving entries such as: > > 7&147b5178&0&0857db02225543071004&0 > > one for each inserted device. > > This is ultimately going to be a problem, since this device is a 12-slot > bulk USB tester/programmer; running at full bore, it could have some > 15000 devices/day inserted into it... each with a different serial > number!! Imagine the size of the registry after six months of use (let > alone *years* of use!!). > > (BTW, I looked at my workstation machine, which is *not* a tester and has > just been used for normal USB access, and there are literally HUNDREDS of > usb entries under the USBSTOR entry; there are 44 separate descriptors, > and each of those descriptors has from 1 to ... hmmm... ALOT!! of serial > number entries under it!! This seems like not that efficient of a > system, somehow... ) > > I'd *really* like to have ONLY the physical address registered, without > the serial number. Is that possible?? > > More specific questions: > > - What if I set GlobalDisableSerNumGen=0 instead of 1, since this is > actually an Enable field, not a Disable field?? > > - Is there some way to create a generic IgnoreHWSerNum, along the lines > of > > IgnoreHWSerNum*.* > > ?? > > Dan Miller > >
- Next message: Gary Chanson: "Re: Write-once with DLL shared memory"
- Previous message: Doron Holan [MS]: "Re: Scancode Mapper and sleep/power keys"
- In reply to: Daniel Miller: "IgnoreHWSerNum redux"
- Next in thread: Alexander Grigoriev: "Re: IgnoreHWSerNum redux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|